All you need to know about Kangana Ranaut-Hrithik Roshan’s hot hook-up!


The clandestine affair that’s taken us by surprise and Bollywood by storm is getting murkier by the minute. Hrithik Roshan and Kangna Ranaut, who allegedly hooked-up during Krrish 3, have lashed out at each other in crazy ways. If rumours are to be believed, the good looking duo got engaged in 2014 when Roshan Jr proposed to theQueen actress in Paris, says a popular entertainment site. With so much happening in this hot affair, we tell you all you really need to know about this…

The la-la love: 

Hrithik, who was married to Suzanne Khan for over a decade, started drifting away from his childhood sweetheart (whom he met her at a traffic signal and it was love at first sight…much like his character Rohit from his debut movie ‘Kaho Na Pyar Hai’!). Apart from allegations of his fling with Kites co-star, it’s said that he reportedly fell in love with Kangs while shooting for Krrish. Even though the two were friends much before their superhero outing, they found solace in each other during the shooting of the hit franchise, state the reports.

The proposal:

A friend close to the duo has spilled the beans on their rumoured proposal to the entertainment site. Hrithik went down on his knees for Kangs in Paris and the two were set to get married post the finalisation of Hrithik’s divorce.

With love comes insecurity!

Apparently, there was a huge misunderstanding between the two, which lead to their split. While Kangana thought Hrithik was considering her as his rebound, he was insecure about a young actor hitting on Kangana, the report further states. The final blow came at Karan Johar’s bash, where the two indulged in a heated argument regarding Hrithik allegedly snooping on Kangs’ personal mails, the report states.

The legal soup:

The ex-lovers slapped each other with legal notices recently. Hrithik sent a legal notice, via his lawyer, to Kangs for defamation. The National Award-winning actress retaliated with a legal notice of her own, charging him of intimidation and threat and stating that she has never taken names so cannot be held guilty for defaming anyone, the site adds further. Phew!

Click here for more…